The River Runs Through It (a 20 foot window, that is!)
by Doug Haacke, September 2009
As the 2009 water year comes to a close in a few weeks, let’s take a
few minutes to look at how this year compared with last year, and
what we can expect for next season.
In many ways, water years 2008 and 2009 were comparable. Both were
essentially normal water years. Both experienced a delayed runoff
after achieving a slightly above average snowpack. However, despite
ample water, Bureau of Reclamation held back river releases to
maintain lake elevation, and month after month the river experienced
minimal to sub-minimal flows. As just about any fifth grader knows,
if you start spring with a higher than normal lake elevation and a
normal runoff/precipitation picture, it’s a pretty good bet you
won’t have storage available for runoff, and be forced to release
lots of water.
That’s exactly what happened this year. Dan Jewell, Area Manager for
the Montana Area Office of the Bureau of Reclamation started the
fall of 2008 with ample storage and above average lake elevations.
He kept the lake elevation up by reducing flows to the river to
2,450cfs which is below the minimum recommended flow for an optimal
fishery of 2,500cfs. By December, lake elevations started setting
records, and from December through May, Bighorn Lake experienced the
highest lake elevations on record for that time period. This might
have been a good thing had the spring forecast predicted something
less than a normal water year. In reality, a normal to slightly
above normal water year was forecast, and the mountains in the
Bighorn Basin were peaking at around 118% of normal snowpack. When
March came and the lake elevation was down only 20 feet instead of
the usual 35 feet, many of us began asking Dan when he would start
drafting the lake and making room for the runoff. When April came
and went without any additional increase in releases, we knew we
were in for some big releases once runoff started. In May Dan
assured us that flows wouldn’t reach 6,500cfs and just weeks later
flows went over 13,000cfs, essentially double the flows forecast by
Reclamation.
Sounds an awful lot like 2008, doesn’t it? With long months of low
flows, followed by massive releases during runoff, followed by low
flows, it was a lot like this year. If one didn’t know better, you’d
almost think a reservoir didn’t exist at Ft. Smith, and that there
wasn’t a team of highly paid experts and engineers planning how to
efficiently balance use of all that water.
In 2009, it wasn’t just the river users who were angry. Many lake
users were hopping mad when they arrived at Bighorn Lake over the
Fourth of July only to find the lake eight feet into the exclusive
flood pool, and most boat launches and campgrounds closed due to
driftwood and other debris blockading the launch points, as well as
other amenities completely submerged. Grant Marsh Fishing Access
Site on the Bighorn River was inundated and nearly destroyed by the
intense releases. One is reminded that Congress has authorized the
Bureau of Reclamation to manage Bighorn Lake for three purposes;
hydro-electric power, irrigation and flood control. 2009 was a
normal water year, and stakeholders downstream of Yellowtail Dam
experienced flooding. As you can imagine, the Corps of Engineers,
who manages the reservoir when lake levels reach the flood pool,
were none too happy either.
When confronted with these facts during a weekly stakeholders’
conference call, Dan Jewell finally admitted that he’s doing the
best he can managing the reservoir for a twenty foot window. That
window, in our case, refers to the twenty feet of elevation that
starts with a full lake or the top of the conservation pool of
Bighorn Lake, which is a lake elevation of 3,640ft, and lake
elevation 3,620ft, which represents an elevation Dan does not want
to venture below. Now to put this in perspective, since the dam
closed in 1967, the average window was nearly twice the size at 35
ft, and used a lower lake elevation of 3,605ft. It just makes sense
that you evacuate storage to make room for runoff, especially when
hard evidence exists in the form of snowpack that runoff is a
certainty.
As you can imagine, Dan has support for his twenty foot window. Lake
users at the south end of the lake love it, of course. From their
perspective, the lake can never be full enough long enough. The
National Park Service publicly asked for the twenty foot window
several years ago, and following a decent water year in 2007, Dan
complied, although not being required to do so. Isn’t it interesting
that the Park Service and Bighorn Canyon National Recreation Area,
whose greatest number of visitors and revenues comes from the river,
ignores those users. In fact, they have a resource management plan
for the lake, but not the river. Let’s not make the mistake of
thinking the National Park Service and Bighorn Canyon National
Recreation Area aren’t part of this problem!
So, what’s the forecast for fall, winter and early spring? Let’s
look at a few numbers to put things in perspective.
The current lake elevation is 3,641.6ft. Here we are in the middle
of September and we’re still in the flood pool. Normally, lake
elevations for this time of year are 15 feet lower at 3,626ft. River
releases are at 3,050cfs, which is slightly higher than the average
of 2,600cfs, but this would be expected when lake levels are still
in the flood pool.
It seems to reason then, with Dan Jewell’s operating policies, that
shortly after lake elevations come out of the flood pool (probably
around the end of the month), river releases will be cut back to
minimums or even less. And then, it’s just 7 or 8 months until high
flows and flooding.
The Bighorn River Alliance, along with many other groups,
organizations and individuals, has developed a strategy to fight Dan
Jewell and the twenty foot window. That strategy will seek the
assistance of Montana’s senatorial delegation and several federal
agencies. We will need the support of as many folks as possible to
bring this important strategy to fruition. As a member of the
Bighorn River Alliance or just a friend of the Bighorn River, we
hope we can count on you when the time comes to write a letter of
support, or make a quick call to your local delegate. Thanks!
